yourlibrarian: MMMC Icon Green (OTH-MMMC Icon Green-yourlibrarian)
yourlibrarian ([personal profile] yourlibrarian) wrote in [community profile] marchmetamatterschallenge2020-03-08 12:36 pm

March Meta Matters Challenge, First Writing Prompt!

Hello everyone! It's check-in time again to see how we're all getting along with our meta importing.

Comment below with any of the following:

1) Are you having internal debates about what content you're considering moving versus not copying over?
2) Are you having any problems moving your meta?

It's also time for your first writing prompt! Can you write some new meta based on old meta you've come across? This could be:

* an update to what you wrote before
* current you is arguing with former you about your ideas
* taking the same idea and applying it to a different fandom
* expressing some of the same ideas in a different format

Whatever approach you take, see if an older work you've been rehousing can be a jumping off point for a new work.

Writing new meta this month is optional. If you do write something though, share a link to it in a future check-in post!
snickfic: Buffy looking over her shoulder (Default)

[personal profile] snickfic 2020-03-09 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
I'm interested to hear that you've decided to post a concert review, because I have a big long review of an album from last year that I was trying to decide whether or not to post. On one hand, it was written with fannish love; on the other hand, it doesn't feel like it exists in the same fannish space as discussion of a TV show - I guess because there's no narrative involved?

On the whole, I feel like I lean towards not crossposting things I'm not sure about. Like, if it's less than 500 words, it feels unlikely anyone would want to read it. If it's dealing with a technical aspect of the work instead of a narrative aspect (I have a post about splash pages in a particular comic), then it doesn't feel like meta, quite, either. IDK.

On the other hand, I'm seriously considering posting a themed set of fic recs - it's about 40 recs with extensive commentary, so it feels plenty substantive, but maybe not appropriate? IDK. I have a lot more angst about "what counts as meta" than I thought I would. 😂
Edited 2020-03-09 04:12 (UTC)